________________________________________________________
Re-Interpretation
of UFO Photo of
By
Mahmoud
E. Yousif
1: Introduction:
Controversies arises whenever UFOs photos presented as an evidence, particularly with venture of many into the field for fame or material gains, these with others has lead to suspicious in genuine photos, worsened with presence of faked or just debunking, thus no criteria was formed to determined UFOs photos.
As UFOs study is aimed among others at proving the existence of UFOs, it is also aiming at laying out general bases for UFOs propulsion system, hence emerged the importance of proving some genuinely UFOs photos.
One of the best UFOs
ever, is the San Jacinto photo of
2: The Sighting and Photo
An experienced pilot, John R. English,
a past Director of the International Aerospace Hall of Fame" (IAHF), San
Diego Air & Space Historical center, who was involved in the research, selection, and installation of
several US and foreign Astronauts, as well as other significant aviation related
candidates, also a licensed pilot S.E.L. and a "Diamond" level Soaring
pilot (18 years), with approx 400 flight hours logged, 350 in high performance
Sailplanes in multiple flight envelopes and conditions.
On July 16,
1988, he was on a flight from Hemet Ryan field, to obtain air to air photos of
Mini-Nimbus Sailplane (N419Z) (V/O).
Five miles
North East of Mt. San Jacinto, at an altitude of 11,000 ft, at 33o 49' N; 116o 44' W (West of Palm Springs, CA), the
Mooney 201 chase plane, piloted by Mr. D. L. S. sitting in the left seat, and
Mr. R. C. (the photographer) sat in the right-front seat and took twenty four
photographs. At a time both aircraft observed a UFO or the unidentified aerial
phenomenon (UAP), for a period from
3- Points Emerged from Previous Research
An inclusive research was
conducted on the photo which came to be known as San Jacinto photo of
1- No evidence of a
hoax or double exposure was found nor were any bolides, meteorites, or other
unidentified aerial phenomena reported for that time and place.
2- There are
differences (and possible causes) between what was reportedly seen and what was
recorded on the photograph, shown in Fig. 1.
3- Mr. Williams
remarked that the UAP (UFO) looked to him like a large reflective sphere almost
like a large ball bearing.
4- The case is similar
to comment by Childerhose
in 1956 that, "The UAP (UFO) looked
more distinct and spherical than it does in the photo, with an area to the rear, several times its diameter
that had a vapor quality." That implies presence
of an object with a polished metal surface and not a diffuse white ball with a
vapor trail that is seen on the film. He did recall seeing a "tail" behind it.
5- The upper and front
edge of the UAP (UFO) that appears to have a double boundary must be due to some
other cause than camera motion.
6- The initial scan
emphasized the left wing of the sailplane where the white (vapor?) trail passed
through it. If this was a double exposure the (positive print) luminance of the
wing in the region of the trail should be somewhat higher than in regions where
the trail did not intersect it because of exposure additively.
7- The areas of the
image that are nearly 100% exposed areas (i.e., diffuse, very luminous white
portion of the UAP tail) appear as an oval shaped, smooth, gray region,
with large granularity is probably due to sunlight scattered from greater
turbulence within the tail. One possibility may be that the UAP's (UFOs) white tail
represents ionized or otherwise excited air by emitted microwave
energy from the UAP, a
possibility that is further supported by the head or leading edge of the effect.
8- In the areas lying
outside of the central, gray region are of Fig. 2, there are thin, parallel fingers, seen
protruding from the rounded front of this image. Most of these fingers
diverge from ten to fifteen degrees arc from the UAP's (UFOs) flight path
(thought to represent energy projections of some sort).
Fig.2. Study by Mr. Richard F. (for NARCAP)
shows parallel figures protruding from rounded front of the object. We interpreted
this as propellant external magnetic field (ExMF) diverged by the internal body of the UFO,
as shown in Figs. 8 and 9 in the ExMF-PS.
9- The appearance of separated striations within the
white tail (see Fig. 4) behind the UAP (UFO) appears to be
consistent with condensation trails of a blunt-nose body in sub-sonic flight
through Earths atmosphere. Of course, the tail may be produced by a totally
different mechanism.
10- The front edge of the head when
magnified and luminance, it is relatively circular (a bit similar to Fig. 2)
and (again) includes several short protrusions located near the top of the head.
The spherical shaped object that Mr. Williams perceived likely corresponded to
part of this rounded region.
11- The luminance of the main body of the
object and immediately adjacent tail area were so high they fully saturated (exposed)
the relatively slow film. This may explain why the photograph does not
correspond closely to what was seen.
12- The films optical density, as measured along the length of the white
tail behind the UAP (UFO), changed in a peculiar fashion and is
not characteristic of reflected sunlight off water droplet vapor.
13- Interesting micro-details were discovered that suggest the
possibility of some type of energy emissions extending from the UAP (UFO)
but not necessarily in the direction of its flight.
14- The nature of the UAP
(UFO) and constitution of its atmospheric trail remains unknown at this time.
15- These studies
clearly demonstrate that the normal human eye perceives very bright targets differently than they
will appear on film that has been exposed under normal conditions.
16- It was derived that,
eye can see slightly
farther into the near infrared than some films.
4: Re-Analysis of the photo
The Photo taken
by the chase plane, shown in Fig. 1, contains much information, as was
analyzed; further analysis could help exploring deeper into the phenomena
constituent.
The photo in
Fig. 3, is marked at specific points, for more analysis, and the following can
be deduced from it:
1- The trail vapors or beam
extends 15.5 cm (in Fig. 3) from lower left edge at (A) to upper right at (D).
2- The beam imprinted
on the photo consists of three parts:
a. The first long trail
from (A) to (B) with length of 7 cm, the vapors trail in this distance is faint
and equally distributed.
b. The second trail or
the mild intense beam from (B) to (C) with length of 4. cm, the imprints
clearly shows diagonal lines, marked by red color.
c. The intense beam
from (C) to (D) with a distance of 4.5 cm, the extension of the diagonal lines,
although diffused by an intense luminosity, but can be traced.
3- The trail of the
vapors from B to D, is characterized by diagonal strips (or separated
striations), with changing patterns of higher and lower dense of vapors
concentrations.
4- The beam of vapors
from (C) to (D) do have the following characteristics:
a. Intense luminosity
in the inner part and low trace in external part.
b. The inner intense is
not smooth, it has some inflations.
c. The inner intense
part, do have curvature.
d. It have diagonal strips (or separated striations) as shown in Fig. 4, with red lines.
e. Nearer the end, the beam
is inflated.
5- As shown in Fig. 3,
the diagonal strips (or separated striations), shows distances of equal
repetition or frequency patterns on both B-C and C-D.
6- Accordingly, the
diagonal strips (or separated striations), between A-B, was like the above, but
had dissipated, and became fainter, therefore these strips and its frequency
could be represented in Fig. 4.
5: Some Characteristics of the ExMF-PS:
From the
External Magnetic Field Propulsion System (ExMF-PS), and other scientific and common
sense, the following can be stated:
1- As UFOs propulsion
system differ from known propulsion systems such as rockets and airplanes,
therefore its photos can't be judged by known criteria.
2- Rockets, satellites
and airplanes as known to human, they considered normal objects; because they
reflected lights from external sources.
3- UFOs source of
energy, suggested by ExMF-PS, radiates electromagnetic radiations
of different wavelength.
4- The UFO as a source
of radiated electromagnetic energy is synonymous to the sun, thus special
filters required to eliminate some frequencies and intensity.
5- UFOs propulsion required
ionized charged particles (electrons and protons) to produce the propellant ExMF.
6- Intense gyrating
electrons that constitute UFO source of energy, radiates electromagnetic
radiations that can be seen at night, while at daytime it may look like vapors
or diffused shapes or as black
hair like threads, similar to sunspots, (compare Fig. 5, with Fig. 6).
7- Any system such as
UFOs that used ExMF as propellant, required two bodies, an
external diamagnetic material as part of propellant and internal body made of
ferromagnetic material to carry the payloads, occupants and instruments and
serves to divert the intense (and potentially harmful) ExMF from the occupants.
8- Intense ExMF propellant produced by UFOs, when some
are photographed during the day time as shown by UFO
Photograph of Calgary, Alberta, Canada - July 3, 1967,
shown in Fig. 6, may look like the Sunspots shown in Fig. 5.
9- The ionizer system
as related to external air constituent is fixed on the external body.
Fig. 5, intense magnetic fields produced by the Sun Spot (NASA), the threads like black hair, is the external
magnetic field (ExMF), shown in some UFOs photos taken at day
time, such as the UFO Photograph Calgary, Alberta, Canada - July 3, 1967
(Fig. 6).
10- Intense ionization
could engulf UFOs with electrons along its flight path.
11- In disks or spheres
like UFOs, ExMF-PS mechanism can be operated from any
point along the circumference.
12- Since both the
external and internal bodies are axially linked, therefore the external body
could be made to spins, while the internal is stable.
13- When external body
spins, the ionizer also spins with it.
6:1 UFO Photo of San Jacinto
Based on both above analyses,
and theoretical characteristics derived from the ExMF-PS, a new building blocks for San
Jacinto photograph are drawn, which may help in answering questions about the differences between what was
reportedly seen and what was recorded on the photograph and the possible causes
for that.
Fig. 6, the famous UFO
Photograph of Calgary, Alberta, Canada - July 3, 1967, the black
threads like at the bottom of the UFO are the magnetic line of force, resulted
from the propellant intense external
magnetic field (ExMF), similar to
the sun spot in Fig. 5.
From these blocks, the
followings are concluded:
1- The vapors trail or path from tail to head, shown in Fig. 1, is divided into three regions, of A-B, B-C and C-D, shown in Fig. 3.
2- The trail A-D is suggested to represents intense ionized electrons, formed by a moving object, each of the three regions differ in characteristics from the other.
3- The characteristics and caused of each region:
a. The luminosity of front part C-D is intense, it has thick areas: The diagonal strips and inflated parts are traceable, but not clearly defined. This part contains movements of the object during the exposure; the object was engulfed by ionized electrons and radiations from ExMF-PS, thus affecting sensitivity of the photo, while the diagonal strips can clearly be re-traced as shown in Fig. 4. The external body of the object is from diamagnetic material, as shown in Fig. 7, is rotating with inclination around the axis, along the motion path, where great amount of ionized electrons are spreads in areas facing the camera lens, on the other hand, when the external moving body with the ionizer spins to the opposite side, ionized electrons are covered by the body, hence less amount appeared. Thus the whole sequences creating pattern or frequency of low and high electrons distribution intensities seen as trail in form of diagonal lines immediately after the object, the frequency is shown in Fig. 4.
b. The second tail, B-C Diagonal strips of low and high intense ionized electrons (or separated striations) are clearly defined, as created immediately by the ionizer on the object external moving body.
c. The first tail part A-B, where ionized electrons doesn’t have defined boundaries of diagonal strips, due to the dissipation of the fast energized electrons.
Fig. 7, a UFO, propelled by external magnetic field (ExMF-PS), possessed theoretical characteristics,
such as spinning of the external body together with the ionizer, hence capable
of producing phenomenon seen on San Jacinto photo of
4- The moving object could either be a disk or a sphere as shown in Fig. 7, while spinning it could be seen as a large ball, due to the fast moving external body, at that particular angle seen by Mr. Williams.
5- The Object was captured by the camera during the exposure time, while moving distances B-D.
6- The disk is propelled by a method that contains electromagnetic radiation.
7- The disk is propelled by the External Magnetic Field Propulsion System (ExMF-PS).
8- The ExMF-PS used by the disk radiated aurora light surrounding the disk, while moving distances B-D.
9- The intense produced ExMF, that propel the Object, entered the inner protected ferromagnetic material (or the keeper) occupied by the operators (or occupants), then emerged as shown in Fig. 7, as lines of forces, detected by the camera and shown in Fig. 2, as thin, parallel fingers diverged from ten to fifteen degrees arc from the UAP's (UFOs) flight path, as analysis by Richard F. Haines.
10- The Object, while moving forward, its external part is rotating along its axis, as explained at ExMF-PS And shown in Fig. 7.
11- From Fig. 1, The UFO (UAU) was moving in a twisted mode of motion as shown in the animation move.
12- The ionizer was set
to maximum, thus ionizing great amount of electrons, seen as vapors.
13- The speed of the Minolta camera which took the photo was much larger than the speed of the moving object, resulted in the C-D diffused part.
14- The end of the beam at top, the inflated and curved parts shows signs of been formed by a moving circular light or material object with intense light.
15- The area at the rear, as shown in Fig. 7, is several times the object diameter, it is consists of the intense ExMF and electromagnetic radiation (aurora)which looks like a vapor.
16- An imaginary reproduction for the movement of the Disk, between C-D is shown in an animation move.
7: Why dose the Pilot Changed course?
Moments before
the photograph was taken, pilot John English changed his flight course, as seen
in the aircraft
relative location, he didn't explain that, and he may not be able to
explain it.
It is known
that pilots are well trained groups of professionals, both in their profession
and detection capabilities, they are continually tested for their sighting strength.
For these
reasons, combined with the six sense, one may state that, the pilot John
English may have detected or sensed the UFO as a threats or in course of his
flight, before realizing its nature, so he decided to turn right avoiding the
collision, at that same moment, the photographer took that shoot, thus the
scenery looks as if it was pre-arranged for that shot, or all these elements
were part of a Galactic Chance!
8: Conclusions:
According to
present stage of technology, the photo shown in Fig. 1, may seem strange, but
when scientifically analyzed, it showed presence of a moving object that is not
familiar to present stage of technology and detecting instruments, but since any
technology and relating measurements at any span of time, reflects the era
developed science, therefore it is possible to state that, "there is missing links within present
scientific knowledge".
Meanwhile, by
introducing interpretations suggested by the External Magnetic Field Propulsion
System (ExMF-PS) and related developed hypothesis,
such as, the Magnetic Interaction Hypothesis (MIH), Elements of Magnetic Lines of Force (EMLF), Spinning Magnetic Force (SMF) and the Universal Energies (UE), a clear picture of an advanced materialistic
object engulfed by ionized electrons is shown.
These interpretations
and explanations, shows presence and behaviors of materialistic flying object
in that specific photograph taken during the flight of pilot John R. English, shown in Fig. 1, which implies it was intelligently
guided, hence presence of alien flying objects or UFOs in this planet earth,
propelled by a different method with great maneuver capabilities and energy unknown
to present level of development, this doesn’t means that we are to deny
presence of such objects just because there is no material prove for that,
explanation given to this picture, other pictures and sightings of different witness
supposed to constitute great awareness towards world wide recognition and
scientific study for the benefit of humankind, at this crucial environmental
looming crises.
Published
By:
http://www.exmfpropulsions.com/
________________________________________________________